-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update to bps.collect_while_completeing #536
update to bps.collect_while_completeing #536
Conversation
565b629
to
cbe0434
Compare
9703a49
to
5ddf953
Compare
5ddf953
to
923490c
Compare
db41573
to
be29b8e
Compare
) | ||
yield from bps.wait(group=group) | ||
done = yield from bps.wait(group=group, timeout=flush_period, move_on=True) | ||
yield from bps.collect(*detectors, name=stream_name) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the removal of return_payload
intentional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@evalott100 Yes this was intentional ..No data was getting generated when return_payload
was False
...I haven't tested this recently.. I will check and see if the behaviour is the same
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have checked this today...This is working ... I'm able to collect data
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't see the full context for this since the github diff is cluttered with all the changes to main since this PR was opened. If you open a new PR after rebasing then add me as a reviewer 🙏
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have created a new PR #691 because the branch go messed up...
3d148de
to
c90e403
Compare
No description provided.